6 |
Letter Teaching in Parent–Child Conversations
|
|
|
|
In: Early Child Res Q (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Letter Features as Predictors of Letter-Name Acquisition in Four Languages with Three Scripts
|
|
|
|
In: Sci Stud Read (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Children benefit from morphological relatedness independently of orthographic relatedness when they learn to spell new words
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0022-0965 ; EISSN: 1096-0457 ; Journal of Experimental Child Psychology ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03244841 ; Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Elsevier, 2018, 171, pp.71-83. ⟨10.1016/j.jecp.2018.02.003⟩ (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Children benefit from morphological relatedness independently of orthographic relatedness when they learn to spell new words
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0022-0965 ; EISSN: 1096-0457 ; Journal of Experimental Child Psychology ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01851979 ; Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Elsevier, 2018 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Response times in CVC naming study, Treiman et al. (1995) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Response times in CVC naming study, Treiman et al. (1995) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Statistical learning and spelling: Evidence from Brazilian prephonological spellers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Statistical Learning and Spelling: Older Prephonological Spellers Produce More Wordlike Spellings than Younger Prephonological Spellers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Measures of Kindergarten Spelling and Their Relations to Later Spelling Performance
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Young Children’s Knowledge of the Symbolic Nature of Writing
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Two experiments with 114 3- to 5-year-old children examined whether children understand that a printed word represents a specific spoken word and that it differs in this way from a drawing. When an experimenter read a word to children and then a puppet used a different but related label for it, such as “dog” for the word ‹puppy›, children often stated the puppet’s label was incorrect. In an analogous task with drawings, children were more likely to state that the puppet was correct in using an alternative label. The results suggest that even young children who cannot yet read have some understanding that a written word stands for a specific linguistic unit in a way that a drawing does not.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809759/ https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12478 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26743133
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|